Archive for America
Watch out for liberals chewing on your fingers!
Posted by: | CommentsDear Jim Bob,
I read on the news that some liberal chewed some guys finger off at a healthcare promotion event. Why do liberals eat fingers Jim Bob?
Curious in California
Dear Curious,
Well, I looked into this and what you say actually happened in California! A bunch of Moveon.org supporters got together for a public rally to support ObamaCare and one of them got involved with a man who didn’t share their favorable opinion of the legislation. Seems like there were about 100 ObamaCare liberals outside on the street carrying signs in support of socialized medicine government control of Doctors. Across the street there was a small group of Americans who did not agree with the liberals position. Both groups started yelling things at each other. One of the liberals came across the street and confronted a 65 year old man who was part of the opposition group. He started calling the old guy a lot of names and being very aggressive. The old guy popped the liberal in the nose! Unfortunately, the liberal went nuts and attacked the old guy physically. Somewhere in the conflict, the liberal bit off one of the old guy’s fingers!
What the news media has not reported about this is that the severed finger was subsequently stolen from the scene by the Moveon.org people. What did they do with it? They had it rigged up with a USB port! Now all they have to do is plug the old guy’s finger into any PC and they can control his mind. I was able to get a picture of the finger which shows the USB port mounted into the finger in question. Here it is:
This raises lots of questions. Senators Jay Rockefeller and Olympia Snow have introduced a bill to give Obama control over the internet in the event of a cyber-attack. People are worried about who will determine what constitutes a cyber-attack and how that will further degrade our freedom. This liberal, finger chewing/USB incident may be a prototype of what Obama and liberal might want to do. What if they can require everyone to donate one of their fingers to the government to receive the USB attachment? I wonder if the news media would report that? Would media members give up one of THEIR fingers?
Is Obama Right? Did we vote for all this?
Posted by: | Comments
Dear Jim Bob,
I just heard an ad on the radio that Obama and the Democrat’s created. It said we are getting what we voted for. I don’t remember Obama saying anything about Nationalizing the banks, the car industry and the health industry during the election. What are they saying Jim Bob?
Carl Marxalot
Portland, Oregon
Dear Carl,
What’s going on right now with these Democrat Ads? Well, it’s like this Carl. When Obama and the Democrats were running in 2008, they were purposely trying to make people believe they are like the rest of us who work and pay taxes and care about our country. Of course, the truth is they are not like the rest of us, but they couldn’t admit it during the election. They would have lost.
The Obama domestic agenda has now unfolded in plain view of anyone who cares to recognize it and it’s pretty ugly. As people’s eyes are opening to Mr. Obama’s true character and intent, opposition is beginning to form and the last thing the Democrats want is an honest debate about anything they want to do. So, they are now running attack ads against YOU! After all, they say, YOU voted for change and we’re delivering it! Anyone who doesn’t like it is probably a radical- right -wing -nut -conspiracy –community -organizer. So, Carl, Americans are the problem, not the congress or the programs this bunch of hacks is trying to pass.
This health care thing is a perfect example of how dangerous they are. Let’s compare our healthcare system (now) to a person who has discovered they have a non-malignant polyp in their colon. The simple solution is a minor out-patient procedure that just snips the polyp away and the patient goes home to live a great life. What if that same person went in to their Doctor and was told that they would get rid of the polyp by removing the entire colon and routing it outside the body into a bag you would excrete into the rest of your life. In addition, they would also be amputating your left leg in the event it might be related to the polyp, although they can’t prove it. To make sure everything is done to fix your polyp problem they are also going to give you a heart and liver transplant at the same time.
Our current healthcare system has some problems. Like the polyp described above. What Obama is giving us with his “reform” is the heart and liver transplant, the leg amputation and the colon removal all in one nice package. And he doesn’t want us to discuss it. Just lay down and take it like a good American Carl. After all , you voted for change.
©2009, James C. Norman
All Rights Reserved
Do The Democrats Want Me Dead?
Posted by: | Comments
Dear Jim Bob,
I’ve been reading about this Democrat healthcare law they are trying to pass. Is it true that old people are going to be encouraged to give up and die? I’m 70 years old. Do Obama and the Democrats want me to die Jim Bob? If so, why?
Eileen Enoughisenough
Elgin, Alabama
Dear Eileen,
Lots of information is now coming out about what’s actually in the new Socialized Medicine Bill the Democrats want for all of us, but they will be exempt from participating in themselves. One of the provisions of this new plan requires anyone on Medicare to sit down every five years to be counseled about whether it’s a good idea for them to keep on breathing. Evidently these government “Death Advisors” will be trying to thin out the population of older people.
About two years ago I told a group of people that I believed government mandated euthanasia was in America’s future. Many in the group rolled their eyes and shook their head as if such an idea was ridiculous. Well, golly…here it is right on our doorstep wrapped up in a package by the same, compassionate Democrat party Americans voted into power last November. American’s wanted change and brother are they getting change!
As far as why the Democrats might want you dead Eileen, think about this: For the past 15 years people have been demanding that some kind of “fix” be created to solve the Social Security problem. What is that problem you ask? It’s that when all the baby boomers retire there will be far more people “getting” than there are people giving (those who actually pay taxes) to support them. Are you beginning to get the picture of why “Death Counseling” for the elderly might be a priority item on the Democrat agenda? If they can reduce the number of elderly people getting benefits they might be able to “fix” social security!
It’s a short trip from “Death Counseling” to mandated euthanasia. That’s when, some bureaucrat will be empowered to rule that living 75 years is probably enough for anybody. I’m sure it will be called something like prohibiting existence beyond the “Optimal Beneficial Longevity Standard (OBLS)”. When you exceed the OBLS you will be picked up in a government car and taken to the “Federal Euthanasia Center”. Of course, the Congress will be exempt from this requirement, just as they exempt themselves from many other laws they put into effect.
Obama World is not pretty.
Would You Vote for a Democrat?
Posted by: | Comments
Dear Jim Bob,
I’ve been reading your blog for awhile and I’m getting the impression you don’t care for Democrats. Is that true? Come on Jim Bob, isn’t there a Democrat somewhere that you would vote for? Surely, there is one!
Mel Moderoso
Modesto, California
Dear Mel,
Hmmm. How could you ever get the opinion that I’m against Democrats? I mean, we are fair and balanced here, right? Yuk Yuk.
Mel, just to set the record straight, the last Democrat I voted for was the peanut farmer from Georgia in 1976 and I learned my lesson from the results of that experience. So, here is my lifelong policy concerning how I vote.
If I even suspect a candidate agrees with a Democrat I will not vote for them. If a candidate is seen riding in the same car, bus, plane or train with a Democrat I will not vote for them. If a candidate happens to live in the same neighborhood with a Democrat I will not vote for them if they live on the same street.
Also, if the candidate lives in any of the following states, I will not vote for them: New York, Massachusetts, Michigan, Wisconsin, New Jersey, Washington or Oregon.
I will not vote for anyone who lives in any of the following cities: New Orleans, Austin, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Albuquerque, Chicago, Minneapolis, Philadelphia, Cleveland or Boulder.
I hope that clarifies my voting policy.
What’s the Big Deal About Political Power?
Posted by: | Comments
Dear Jim Bob,
Every time the Democrats pass some law that is supposed to help us, I hear their critics say that the law in question is really about giving them more power so they can control our lives. If that’s true, what’s the big deal about getting all that power? I mean, why do they want it so bad and what motivates them to do it.
Olivia Ovisaries
Olympia, Washington
Dear Olivia,
You have asked a great question. To understand power and the people who seek it, you have to go back the high-school experience. When you think about high school there were actually three categories of people. You had High School Conservatives, High School Liberals and High School Moderates. Here’s how it worked:
HIGH SCHOOL CONSERVATIVES: These were the achievers and the people who seemed to win everything. They were pretty much self-reliant and confident. They set goals and were willing to work and sacrifice to get what they valued. However, these people had a few flaws and one of them was to pick on the High School Liberals and some of the Moderates. They made fun of them and sometimes ridiculed the Liberal’s goofy behavior and opinions. Mostly, they did not respect the Liberals and talked down to them. You could say Conservatives had a lack of respect for the Liberals.
HIGH SCHOOL LIBERALS: These were the people who never seemed to be happy and rarely got any real recognition from others. They always seem to finish out of the top 10. Essentially they went through life with a chip on their shoulder and were jealous of the Conservatives. Liberals really believed that the circumstances of their existence were very unfair and were never able to accept the idea that their condition was related to what they did or how they performed. As a result, they developed the idea that they were victims of Conservative manipulation and persecution. This set the stage for Liberals to spend their lives trying to get control of the uncontrollable so they might feel better about themselves.
HIGH SCHOOL MODERATES: These were just Liberals who did not have the courage or the character to become Conservatives.
So, Olivia you can now understand what drives Liberal politicians. They use their legislative power to exact revenge for their high-school experience. They figured out that passing laws that punish “winners” and “successful people” makes those people subservient to them. Those people are now forced to come to the Liberals, hat in hand, and pay homage to their importance. That’s what power represents to Liberals. It creates an environment that forces people they don’t like to treat them as if they are really important. They find they get a lot of attention by the media and they love to get their faces on TV so they can appear to be an expert and wise. So, what power is really all about is ego and self aggrandizement.
Hope this helped you understand the issue Olivia.
©2009, James C. Norman
All Rights Reserved
Nancy, What Do you Really Care About?
Posted by: | Comments
Dear Jim Bob,
I’ve had all I can take of your stupid blog! I first heard about it right after you wrote that disgusting post about “Will Democrats Save Us From Cow Farts?”. How dare you trivialize the global warming threat. As you probably know by now I rammed the Global Warming Tax Bill through Congress faster than you can say “HOT”. Unfortunately, a few right-wing extremists forced us to remove the cow fart taxes. It’s time you understood that we in Congress know what is best for Americans and we intend to take over their lives at every level in the next couple of years. Do you realize how much we will control when we get our Socialized Medicine Bill passed (I mean our Healthcare Security Act)? It’s time you conservatives realize that WE won the last election and we are in control! We get to do whatever we want and there’s nothing you can do about it.
N. Pelosi
Washington, DC
Dear N. Pelosi,
Yes, I understand that you lefty’s won the election and are in control. I also remember when Jimmy Carter won the White House in 1976. How well did that turn out? You know Nancy, the biggest problem with your side is that it rarely, if ever, tells the truth about anything. Take the Global Warming tax bill you folks just passed. The scientific “consensus” on the Global Warming hoax has crumbled. More and more scientific testimony is exposing this myth. That is the truth, yet your side is so invested in taxing the life out our economy that you suppress the contrary evidence. The only effect your Global Warming taxes will have will be to increase our energy costs and put us in a competitive hole economically. If you really believed all this Global Warming hysteria you wouldn’t be hot-footing it around the country in your government jet laying down a carbon footprint that “out-carbons” the excesses of Al Gore!
I understand that getting through to you and your kind by way of logic and truth is impossible. Your agenda is to just be in control and to try to stay in control and you’ll do whatever it takes to accomplish it. However, do you have grandchildren Nancy? What kind of country are you leaving them with all your left-wing legislation. Why do you willingly saddle them with debt the likes of which has never been seen in our history? Why do you want them to live in a country that has to compete with one arm tied behind its back? Why do you think individual initiative and personal success has to be handicapped by excessive regulation and taxes? I have lots of other questions but you wouldn’t care about them either.
Obama’s Approval Rating
Posted by: | CommentsDear Jim Bob,
Based on what I see Obama doing with all the big spending and taking over much of the private sector of the economy, I wonder how he has such a high approval rating. How do you explain that Jim Bob?
Teresa Tempertantrum
Tin Star, Texas
Dear Teresa,
Great question! Approval ratings and polls are just a reflection of what people believe. What people believe is based on the information they have in their brain that forms the basis for what they believe. So, to understand why Obama has high approval is merely an exercise in examining what people believe and why they believe it. Unfortunately, the things people believe are not necessarily true.
There are three factors that are impacting what people believe about Mr. Obama:
1. The mainstream news media and the “spin” they put on what is happening in the world every day.
2. The fact that we now live in a sound bite society and most people are so focused on their own little slice of life that they are uninformed about the details of what is happening politically (For example, most don’t know about all of Mr. Obama’s Czar appointments and the significance of what he has really done to circumvent public inspection and oversight of his policies. Nor do they understand the basic facts about how economies function and what really stimulates growth and opportunity).
3. The fact that we now have a few generations of people, the majority of whom who are incapable of critical thinking. They are also incapable of a lot of other things (Like operating a cash register that doesn’t have pictures on the keys, or adding up a list of numbers without a calculator).
So, what we largely have is a society that can’t think, a society that suffers from Attention Deficit Disorder, and a biased media that ignores in depth, critical reporting about anything Obama. This means the information people get is badly tainted. They limit what they know to the sound bites from the mainstream media. How is it tainted? Mostly it’s tainted about who is responsible for the country’s economic situation and what it will really take to get it turned around.
Obama and the Democrats continue to blame George W. Bush for all things evil, and they have been doing it relentlessly for the past 8 years – totally cheered on and supported by the mainstream media. The primary message people are getting is that Obama is a victim of George W. Bush and he’s working so hard to overcome the handicap of following the evil Republicans. So, they believe whatever Obama is doing is good and they approve his actions. George Bush is happy and completely willing to be blamed (as he has done for the past 8 years) so there is no challenge from his camp.
At some point, this may change. When it becomes evident that Mr. Obama has systematically trashed our economy and it begins to erode media revenues, there might be some new information out there that will change what people believe. When someone you love is denied a life-saving operation by our new health care ‘Czars’ the reality of Obama may begin to sink in. However, don’t hold your breath waiting for it to happen. The true “misery index” (unemployment rate + inflation rate) of Mr. Obama has not yet run its course. When it does become evident, it may be too late.
George W. Bush and The Swine Flu
Posted by: | CommentsDear Jim Bob,
I find it pretty suspicious that only a few months after Bush left the White House and moved back to Dallas this swine flu problem surfaced. The epidemic seems to be impacting lots of people who are Hispanic. I’m suspicious Jim Bob. Could this really be the “Bush Flu” we’re looking at?
Dora Doubtful
Dover, Delaware
Dear Dora,
WOW! I think you might be on to something here. Bush clearly has the power to pull off something like this. Anybody who can steer a hurricane into New Orleans could easily pull off a little flu epidemic. AND…most Hispanics voted for Obama in the last election!
I bounced this theory off a Democrat I know and she believed the evidence to support your idea is compelling. The health authorities have concluded the flu strain originated in Mexico and the people initially effected in the US had been in Mexico, or around somebody who had been to Mexico. Everybody knows that Bush speaks SPANISH and that Dallas is only a short plane ride to Mexico.
Evidently, George W. continues to plague the lives of Americans in ways we have only begun to understand. President Obama continues to blame Bush for every problem known to man and will no doubt continue to blame him for as long as he occupies the White House. The crimes of George W. Bush will never cease to be exposed.
©2009, James C. Norman
All Rights Reserved
How Come Obama Gets On TV So Much?
Posted by: | CommentsDear Jim Bob,
I’m not a sour grapes kind of guy Jim Bob, but every time I look up President Obama is on TV promoting himself. Heck, whenever I wanted to use TV to really say some things I thought were important the National TV networks resisted it and would draw lots to see which of them would carry my message. Also, he seems to be able to get away with anything he wants and nobody ever asks him any tough questions. That was not my experience. Did I miss something Jim Bob?
George W. Bush
Retired
Dallas & Crawford, Texas
Dear W,
Bless your heart George. You still don’t get it do you? The reason your Presidency crashed and burned in public perception is because you really believed Democrats were logical people and the media was objective and fair. You really thought you could get along with those people even as they spent 8 years dismembering your image with a constant barrage of propaganda, hate and downright deception.
Mr. President, you never opened your mouth to contest them in an effective and meaninful way. You let them control the public spin on your Presidency, without complaint. Did you hope they would see what a nice guy you really are and eventually come around to partner with you? Democrats and liberals don’t do that George! Truth, justice and facts are not a part of their strategy.
Unfortunately, your willingness to let them control the public message without objection, led to the mess we have today. You, Mr. President by your refusal to engage in active, public debate with these people gave us the climate that produced this current Democrat reign of liberal terror. I was grateful the day you were elected and I thank you for much of what you did for our country. Unfortunately, you also gave us Obama, Pelosi and Reed. It’s too late to complain about Obama on TV.
©2009, James C. Norman
All Rights Reserved
What’s all this about Homophobia?
Posted by: | CommentsDear Jim Bob,
I read the other day that US Congressman Barney Frank referred to Supreme Court Justice Antony Scalia as a homophobe. Isn’t a ‘phobia’ some kind of condition that involves being afraid of something? Why would Rep Frank say that a Supreme Court Justice is afraid of gay people or “gayness”. Come to think of it, I hear lots of people called homophobes. What’s this about Jim Bob?
Latisimus J. Forscan
Fern Park, Florida
Dear Latisimus,
You ask a legitimate question Latisimus. To explain this I first need to give you the definition of “Homophobe”. By the way…did you know there is a ‘Gay Dictionary’? If you don’t believe me, just Google it. There is some real interesting reading in the thing. Anyway, according to the Gay Dictionary, homophobe is a term that originated in the 1970’s.
Here’s the definition: “homophobia: Irrational fear or hatred of gay people and of homosexuality.
Latisimus, the first thing you have to understand is that there are two camps of people when it comes to the subject of homosexuality. There are people who believe there is nothing morally wrong with people of the same sex playing around with each other’s private parts. Then, there is another camp of people who believe that same sex activity is a form of sin and a form of sexual perversion.
The people who believe that homosexuality is morally ‘wrong’ base their opinions on common sense about what is normal and what isn’t normal. Their opinions are supported by various descriptions of homosexuality in the Bible. Since the vast majority of human beings are not homosexual, they find the acts homosexuals perform on each other to be repugnant and offensive, just on the basis of common sense. If you want to understand some of those acts, just go browse through the homosexual dictionary for a couple of hours and you’ll get the picture pretty quick.
The people who believe there is nothing morally wrong with homosexual activity are mostly people who are gay, along with ‘straight’ people they have persuaded to agree with them from a political perspective. Homophobia is the term the people who like homosexuality use to demonize anyone who disagrees with them.
When you see that the definition of homophobia paints people who do not approve of homosexuality as being “irrational”, you can understand why it is used. When people are trying to defend something that is pretty hard to defend on the basis of common sense and right and wrong, they usually resort to name calling to marginalize their opponents. The way the homosexual lobby does it is by painting all people who disagree with them as being “irrational”. In other words, if their opponents can be made to appear as unreasonable, hateful, crazy people, then they don’t have to debate them on the basis of fact, or common sense.
So, Latisimus, Rep Barney Frank, who is gay, accused Supreme Court Justice Scalia of being ‘homophobic’ because Scalia believes homosexuality is a sexual perversion and a sin. I’m pretty sure Justice Scalia doesn’t hate gay people. He just has an opinion that is different from Rep Frank. It is an opinion that Rep Frank is unwilling to debate on the basis of morality, so he chooses to paint Scalia as “irrational”.
Hope that clears it up for you.
©2009, James C. Norman
All Rights Reserved
